Archive | news RSS for this section

An Introduction to Jared Lee Loughner

Interesting introduction from the YouTube account of Jared Lee Loughner, the person accused of the Arizona shootings that struck Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) in the head, injuring 12 people and killing Federal Judge Bill Roll.

Share

Mark Twain + Huckleberry Finn – nigger/injun= ?

Mark Twain

I wonder if Mark Twain imagined on the 100th anniversary of his death, not only would the release of his autobiography be an instant best-seller, but that a decision for a publisher to censor two words would cause such an uproar and controversy inciting so much debate about censorship and literature.

NewSouth The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn

NewSouth Books explained their decision to censor the words “nigger” and “injun” out of a new edition of Huckleberry Finn.

In a bold move compassionately advocated by Twain scholar Dr. Alan Gribben and embraced by NewSouth, Mark Twain’s Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn also replaces two hurtful epithets that appear hundreds of times in the texts with less offensive words, this intended to counter the “preemptive censorship” that Dr. Gribben observes has caused these important works of literature to fall off curriculum lists nationwide.

They seem to feel justified in the move because they found a Twain scholar to sign off on this. And they argue that what they are essentially doing is pre-”premptive censorship.” What a thing for a publishing house to pat itself on it’s back for. Yikes. And the rationalization used is to get the book in more schools and more libraries.

I would rather of seen the challenging of the institutions criteria for censoring books that are considered to be classics than to simply try and beat them to the punch. The idea of “ok, they win” is a slippery slope that we are apparently on and with all the attempts at censorship in our country today, it is sad that they are getting the help from a publisher to do so. (I posted a similar comment on the NewPages South’s blogpost where they defend their position. Comments need to be approved. I am interested to see if they approve mine, or censor that as well.)

In presenting his rationale for publication, eloquently developed in the book’s introduction, Dr. Gribben discusses the context of the racial slurs Twain used in these books. He also remarks on the irony of the fact that use of such language has caused Twain’s books to join the ranks of outdated literary classics Twain once humorously defined as works “which people praise and don’t read.”

Aka: In the introduction Dr. Gribben defends the censorship. He then remarks on the irony that a publishing house is putting profits over principles, er, I mean, attempts to distract with a loosely related Twain quip.

At NewSouth, we saw the value in an edition that would help the works find new readers. If the publication sparks good debate about how language impacts learning or about the nature of censorship or the way in which racial slurs exercise their baneful influence, then our mission in publishing this new edition of Twain’s works will be more emphatically fulfilled.

Back to the profits before principles sentiment I mentioned above. Are we to think this is an altruistic move on behalf of NewSouth Books to incite conversation or debate on censorship? And the best way they thought they could do that was by practicing censorship? Can you imagine a fire chief committing arson to get people to talk about fire safety and the danger of fires?

Not only did they censor the book, but they didn’t even have the balls to say the two words they decided to remove from the text.

But I would be remiss if I would ignore or deny the fact that has in fact encouraged dialog about censorship. Here’s spme of the better posts and editorials I have come across regarding this.

Truth Dig: 10 Reasons Why the Slurs Should Stay in ‘Huck Finn’
Just a good, simple to the point list of reasons.

The Missouri Review: Countering Pre-Emptive Censorship
Makes the expected but valid and poignant points you would expect.

WSJ, Speakeasy: Should Mark Twain Be Allowed To Use the N-Word?
Ishmael Reed makes some good points. (Although the line about if we censor the N-word, rap music would disappear. Ugh. I wonder if hip-hop will ever be able to rise above certain stigmas…)

HTMLGiant: “N word” removed from Huck Finn
I never read the comments on any page or blog. Except occasionally HTMLGiant. I can’t stand Roxane Gay at all, but people not only take her to ask, but also make some great points I hadn’t thought of or read elsewhere. If you can stomach it/her…

Susan Orlean in The New Yorker: Captain Underpants and Huckleberry Finn
Orlean does a good job pointing out the absurdity of the whole thing.

So the word “nigger” will be replaced with “slave.” I couldn’t locate what “injun” will be replaced by. Not sure if the political correctness police decided to go with “Native American” or “genocide victims of imperialist European white men’s lies.”

Edit/Update:
Here is the brilliant Daily Show piece on this:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Mark Twain Controversy
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook
Share

Cablegate

Wow.
I read this the other day and it had the smell of the then upcoming Wikileaks dump written all over it.

Today was the day the U.S. government (rightly) feared as the first batch of over 250,000 diplomatic cables was released and the four major news outlets (and apparently the Atlantic got it’s hands on some of the goods early…) around the world that had a chance to preview the cables were allowed to publish their findings of Cablegate.

New York Times
Cables Obtained by WikiLeaks Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels
(First day of the series.)

Der Spiegel
The US Diplomatic Leaks: A Superpower’s View of the World
(Full piece to be released in print and to subscribers Monday, with English excerpts also available.)

Guardian
US embassy cables leak sparks global diplomatic crisis
(Ouch.)

Le Monde
Wikileaks : Dans les coulisses de la diplomatie américaine
(No, I still don’t speak French.)

El Pais
La mayor filtración de la historia deja al descubierto los secretos de la política exterior de EE UU

The other night I sat in a movie theater here in Paris and watched Fair Game. I was familiar with the story of Valerie Plame and her husband Joe C. Wilson 4th, but seeing it acted out was pretty bad. Not the acting, but the reality of it all. I sat there watching it in, of all places, France. The only heavyweight to stand up to the Americans and not back the war, the only ones to not kowtow to the mighty U.S. government, the only ones not to get swept up in the propaganda, not only the (wrong) target of much (misplaced) American ire, the but of countless American jokes, the ones to find themselves as one of the “them” in the whole “you are either with us or against us” nonsense. A country so hated that people in America felt it became their patriotic duty to no longer refer to fried potatoe sticks as “french” fries but to rechristen them “freedom fries.” And I sat in the theater thinking that not only the French, but the entire world had justification to hate, despise or look down on us. Not for our freedom but our fucking ignorance. I wanted to apologize to each person on the way out of the theater. I was literally sick to my stomach.

And I can’t help but think that the stuff that shows up on Wikilieaks isn’t anything more than an understandably justifiable as a result of our ego and arrogance. The high and mighty and “we can do no wrong and even if we do we have a bigger and better military and deeper pockets to get ourselves out of anything we might get ourselves into, save for a little bad PR kind of mess” attitude may of gotten us here. No one painted the target on our backs. We did. The idea that we could fly in the face of international treaties and laws, and then have the balls to be incensed when our skirt is pulled up is crazy to me.

Some of the information is going to look bad. And some of it probably is. The reality is that some of the uncovered doings are probably business as usual and is the same stuff that all or most countries engage in. But they haven’t invited worldwide hatred, distrust or scrutiny, so they don’t have to deal with the mess the United States is about to find itself in. I’s a tad ironic that the same government that feels they don’t need a reason to read my emails without a court order because why should I care if I have nothing to hide, feels differently when it comes to their own correspondence. My sponsor recently told me, “if you don’t want people to talk shit about you, don’t give them anything to talk shit about.” I do understand that running a country is slightly different than my at times unmanageable life, but there is probably a reason that no one is talking about all the clandestine activities, espionage, and black sites Canada is up to. They probably aren’t up to too many.

The last major Wikileaks release, the Iraq WarLogs, seemed like it received a fraction of the attention it should of. Maybe we are weathered and worn to the idea of us treating “those people over there” badly. No shocker. And while clearly the government counts on people’s short attention span to be able to weather PR nightmares, you get a sense that this one has Washington a little more scared than usual. Apparently Mrs. Clinton has been working the phones relentlessly with countries around the globe to prepare them. Can you imagine having to make that call? Ouch. Part of the government spin to try and regain control of this is to say it puts people’s lives at risk. Yet when pressed, several government officials were forced to concede they could not name one person who had died as a result of the last leak.

But here, to find out what we are doing and saying and spying on with our friends? Ouch. To cut through the media propaganda about what the government wants us to worry about and see what they are really worried about? In their own words? Ouch. It’s as if someone is getting rid of the smoke and taking down the mirrors they had so craftily constructed. I am just starting to read the articles and contents, and it just doesn’t look good. No matter how you try and slice or justify it. Anyone else doing any reading on this? Thoughts?

NYT’s The Lede is doing Updates on the Reaction to U.S. Diplomatic Cables Released by Wikileaks in real time, which is a pretty good worldwide monitoring of press and government responses to the leak.

It will be interesting to see the rest of the fallout from this. I can’t help but believe this is just more fallout from what the Bush administration set in motion post 9/11. It is going to take the world, generations to clean up the fallout and there’s a chance that we may never recover from it all.

The United States is a young country and clearly does not know or care about world history and a fact about empires. That all come crashing down at some point. It is naive to think we can’t, won’t or it isn’t happening right now in front of our eyes.

Updates on the Reaction to U.S. Diplomatic Cables Released by Wikileaks

Share

My (Former) Employers + Feds

Federal Agents/
Mad ’cause I’m flagrant/
Tapped the cell/
Plus the phone in the basement…

So I have been a little busy over the past few weeks with my trip to Spain and just running around, but something happened a few weeks ago that I wanted to post about.

Porn-center offices raided in Center City

Yup, my former employers.
So, one of the myriad of things that makes this so interesting is not the fact that several federal agencies raided a former employer of mine, it’s the fact this is the second former employer that was paid a visit by the feds.

Gone Internet.net

This was my former employer from years ago. I had worked there for about six years and was subpoenaed to be a witness for the prosecution. (AKA: the government compelled me to testify against my employer.)

Here’s a few fun facts:

  • I was never a target of either investigation, at any point
  • I had no knowledge of any wrongdoings by either company
  • The owner of GoInternet was recently sentenced to twenty-three years in federal prison
  • I highly, highly doubt that there was anything illegal in the boxes of evidence from National.

Heres the thing about National: there are HUGE in the adult industry. A major player. The owner is an exceptionally smart businessman. He knows companies like his are always in the government crosshairs. As a result, and I know from my experience there, they do not want to push the envelope and they take as many preemptive steps as possible to avoid ending up in trouble. They are extremely proactive in not only doing what is legal, but having safeguards in place so that if/when certain laws or political waves change, they are ahead of the curve.

So, if that is the case, why did the feds show up? That I don’t know for sure. What were they after? From what I have read and people I have talked to I have a pretty good idea. And if they are correct as to what the government is trying -or going to- accuse National of, they are far, far off. It will be interesting though because the nature of it is the hot-button topic of cybercrime. I am guessing the government wanted to go after a high-profile company to make their case, but I am more than confident they picked the wrong one. It will be interesting though because it could turn out to be a landmark case both as far as the adult industry and doing business via the internet. The government sure has an upward battle and their work cut out for them if I am correct though. What’s interesting is that the feds have an amazing conviction rate. They don’t just randomly throw cases around. But when you pick on one of the big boys in an industry that makes rediculous amounts of money and has deep pockets and good friends to help them defend their case… It will be interesting to see how this turns out.

My guess? They find some small misstep somewhere, some small and non-sexy infraction, and National gets a slap on the wrist.

Other related items:

The thing that was sad about GoInternet was that it was a good idea and Neal had secured contracts with the Baby Bell’s to ensure payment for services. If he wasn’t greedy and let the company grow naturally instead of cutting corners (and stealing money), it would of been solid.

Where apparently GoInternet was dirty as hell, I would venture a guess that National is squeaky clean. I’m sure this is a headache now to deal with now, but all the publicity it is and will get will only help National once they are likely vindicated. (Didn’t the government learn anything with their shoddy case against Buttman? Granted, I think the nature of the two cases will be different, but going after major players in the industry who are smart enough to cross their “i”s and dot their “t”s probably won’t work out for them.)

So, it does all beg the question though:
What’s up with the companies I work for? Sure does create an interesting work environment.

At GoInternet I worked in the web design department and was completely insulated and removed (literally, physically and figuratively) from the bad bookkeeping and sales practices. At National I also have had no knowledge or done anything even seeminly illegal or suspect, not did I witness or have any inclination of such.

George is frequently encouraging me to write a book about my life. He thinks it’s intersting.

Maybe he is right.

Share